![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jimmyschmidt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/E96B7644-723B-450A-A39B-6FC73788F698.jpeg?resize=300%2C169\")
<\/p>\n
By James Dinneen<\/p>\n
Solanum jamesii<\/i>, aka the Four Corners potato, has sustained Indigenous people in the American Southwest for 11,000 years; USDA is now studying its 8-year shelf life, and its resistance to disease, heat, and drought. The future of this remarkable little potato remains unwritten.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \u201cHello everybody,\u201d Bruce Pavlik<\/strong> said to no one. It took me a second to realize that Pavlik, an ecologist at the University of Utah\u2019s Red Butte Garden, was addressing the plants. We were standing above a wide desert canyon just outside Bears Ears National Monument in southeastern Utah; near us was a stand of juniper trees. Further out, the canyon bottom was dotted with fragrant sagebrush and twisted pi\u00f1on. And somewhere down there, likely near two humps of red sandstone where people\u00a0once lived for a thousand years, were the potatoes.<\/p>\n Lisbeth Louderback, Pavlick\u2019s collaborator and spouse, appeared beside him wearing a backpack GPS rig. An archaeologist at the University of Utah and the Natural History Museum of Utah, Louderback would use the rig to mark the locations of any potato plants we found, precise to the millimeter. Leaves collected from each plant would then be sent to a lab for DNA sequencing, the latest data in a sprawling research project on a wild potato species called the Four Corners potato. In 2017, Louderback and Pavlik found evidence<\/a> that Indigenous peoples in the Southwest have used the potato for at least 11,000 years\u2014far longer than any other documented potato use in North America.<\/p>\n That finding spurred the pair to delve further into how Ancestral Pueblo, Ute, and Din\u00e9 people used the potato along with maize, squash, and beans\u2014the so-called \u201cThree Sisters\u201d core to Indigenous agriculture in the Southwest. Archaeologists believe the Three Sisters were first domesticated in Central America, then brought to the dryland farms of the Colorado Plateau through the extensive trading networks that existed at the time. Louderback and Pavlik suspected the potato had also been carried around, cultivated, and perhaps even domesticated, all within the Four Corners area. If true, the potato would represent one of only a handful of independent crop domestication <\/a>events anywhere, and the only known example in North America west of the Mississippi. \u201cIt puts us on the map,\u201d Louderback told me.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \u201cReconnecting to the potato brings back our stories, our songs, our connection to the landscape. It brings back the cultural memory of how we used to nourish ourselves.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n But plumbing the potato\u2019s secrets has required more than just archaeology. What started with Louderback and Pavlik has grown into a collaboration between some unlikely partners, with different, arguably incompatible views of how the potato should be used and valued. These include Department of Agriculture (USDA) geneticist John Bamberg, who is leading the work to interpret the potato\u2019s DNA for fingerprints of domestication. Separate from the archaeology, Bamberg is working to use the Four Corners potato\u2019s unique genes to breed a common potato more resistant to disease, heat, and drought\u2014an increasingly urgent project in the face of our changing climate. Bamberg\u2019s team is also exploring some of the potato\u2019s other singular traits, like its ability to remain viable for eight years in the fridge, or its resistance to extremely cold temperatures.<\/p>\n Also on the team is Cynthia Wilson, a Din\u00e9 nutritionist and traditional foods advocate working to restore the potato to Native communities and gardens, and to collect ancestral knowledge from Din\u00e9 elders. \u201cReconnecting to the potato brings back our stories, our songs, our connection to the landscape,\u201d Wilson told me. \u201cIt brings back the cultural memory of how we used to nourish ourselves.\u201d<\/p>\n In August, I traveled to the Four Corners area to learn more about this curious group, and the potato that has brought them together. From Salt Lake City, I headed south with Louderback and Pavlik in search of potato clusters that might have persisted from ancestral gardens. In the Monument Valley in the Navajo Nation, I met with Wilson at her home, where growing the potato seemed an act of defiance against centuries of oppression. And in Cloudcroft, New Mexico, I met with Bamberg, whose potato breeding research may well be a feat of modern agricultural science with a genetic debt to centuries of Indigenous farming. I left sure this most ancient potato, whichever way one chooses to see it, is anything but stuck in the past.<\/p>\n Unless you are a uniquely experienced potato eater, the Four Corners potato, known by botanists as Solanum jamesii<\/em> (pronounced james-EE-aye<\/em>), is unlike any potato you\u2019ve eaten. The potato you\u2019ll find in a grocery store is Solanum tuberosum<\/em>, the common potato. Idaho, Russet, Yukon and the rest are all varieties of that species, which was domesticated in the Andes around 8,000 years ago, cultivated by the Inca, and brought to the rest of the world by the Spanish in the 16th<\/sup> century. The Four Corners potato, Solanum jamesii<\/em>, is related to the common potato in somewhat the same way coyotes are related to dogs. Its tubers are about as small and varied as grapes.<\/p>\n Louderback and Pavlik\u2019s saga with the tiny potato began in 2013. Louderback was working to reconstruct ancient Southwestern diets using microscopic starch grains recovered from an archaeological site in Utah\u2019s Escalante Valley. She had found grains she thought might be from the potato on an 11,000-year-old grinding stone, but had not yet developed a\u00a0way to distinguish the grains of one potato species from another. And while there was ethnographic evidence that the potato had been used for centuries by Hopi, Din\u00e9, Zuni, and a number of other Indigenous groups, there was no evidence for potato use that far back in time. In any case, the plant was uncommon that far north. Even if the grains turned out to be from the Four Corners potato, it seemed unlikely to have been a significant source of food in the region. Louderback might have disregarded the unidentified grains, had two things not happened.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n First, doing field work one day, Pavlik found a small cluster of potato plants growing just a few hundred steps from the Escalante Valley site. Then, a few days later, the pair happened upon a book at a local bed and breakfast that claimed Mormon cavalry in the 19th<\/sup> century had called the Escalante area \u201cPotato Valley.\u201d The two finds suggested to them that the Four Corners potato may have been a more important food source than they had believed. Further, if people had not only foraged, but transported and cultivated the potato, it was also conceivable that selection by farmers of the best-performing plants and adaptation to new habitats had altered the wild potatoes into something more desirable to people, something domesticated. \u201cWe thought, this is too good,\u201d said Pavlik.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n It was conceivable that selection by farmers of the best-performing plants and adaptation to new habitats had altered the wild potatoes into something more desirable to people, something domesticated.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n That\u2019s not to say proving any of it would be easy. \u201c[Archaeologists] aren\u2019t used to thinking about living things,\u201d Pavlik told me. \u201cThey\u2019re all bones and stones. Living things aren\u2019t so convenient.\u201d<\/p>\n Over the next several years, Pavlick, Louderback, and a growing group of collaborators, including Bamberg and Wilson, pursued these suspicions about the potato along multiple lines of evidence: starch grains, geographic distribution, nutritional analysis, and traditional knowledge. With this, they established that the potato was used, transported, and cultivated widely in the Four Corners region. To show domestication however, they needed more DNA from potatoes growing near archaeological sites, which is why Pavlik and Louderback had appeared in the desert talking to plants.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Soon we were hiking down a steep sandy wash, still mushy from rain. This boded well. Without sufficient moisture, the potato\u2019s tubers can remain underground for more than a decade awaiting their moment to sprout. That\u2019s a sensible strategy for a desert plant, but it can make for tough collecting. In 2019, a dry year, the team\u2019s first survey for the domestication project had been a disappointment. Then 2020 was a bust due to both drought and Covid-19. But this summer was looking up: On the drive from Salt Lake City south to Bears Ears, a late summer monsoon<\/a> had brought every plant in that red desert country into its most vivid green.<\/p>\n Pavlik, up ahead, was the first to find potatoes. \u201cLook at all of \u2018em. Oh my god!\u201d he shouted. When we caught up, he pointed out a cluster of at least 80 short leafy plants, topped with sweet-smelling white and yellow flowers. They were growing along the rim of a stone-ringed depression Louderback explained was likely once the foundation of a pit house. \u201cEven on this small scale, the plants are with <\/em>the archaeology,\u201d Pavlik said. The ground around the potatoes was littered with fragments of ceramics, some with black and white geometric patterns, others with grooves finger-pressed in the clay.<\/p>\n After marking each potato plant with a bright red flag, the pair went to work collecting GPS data and leaf clippings, sealing each sample in teabag-like sacks to dry. Later, the leaves\u2019 DNA would be purified, then sequenced.Differences between wild and archaeology-associated populations might then indicate domestication, especially if those genetic differences were linked to desirable traits like tuber size or bitterness. The hope was that these plants, and their genomes, were artifacts, just as much as the ceramics scattered around them.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n That evening, over a dinner of steak and mashed potatoes (what else?), Louderback and Pavlik explained what it would mean to find robust evidence that the potato had been domesticated. Though the genetic data remains preliminary (their most recent paper<\/a> shows potatoes from archaeological sites often cannot produce seeds, a sign of a genetic bottleneck possibly caused by human transport) they agreed such a finding would put the Four Corners potato on the world-historical map of agricultural beginnings. It would point, as Pavlik put it, to \u201cthe genius of [Indigenous] stewardship and ancestry.\u201d It would also deepen the story archaeologists tell about ancient diets in the Southwest, adding another energy-rich and nutrient-dense option to the middle-Holocene menu.<\/p>\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jimmyschmidt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/32153114-9EA9-4ABF-83B2-6DEA1E761900.jpeg?resize=300%2C225\")
\u2014<\/h2>\n![\"Solanum](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thecounter.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/map-showing-where-four-corners-potatos-grow-111921.png?w=730&ssl=1\")
<\/div>\n\n
\u2014<\/h2>\n<\/center>\n
![\"Bruce](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thecounter.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Bruce-Pavlik-marks-Four-Corners-potato-plants-with-red-flags-Utah-Nov-2021.jpg?w=730&ssl=1\")
<\/div>\n![\"Lisbeth](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thecounter.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Lisbeth-Loderback-Bruce-Pavlick-measure-GPS-coordinates-Bears-Ears-National-Monument-November-2021.jpg?w=730&ssl=1\")
<\/div>\n
![\"Potsherds](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thecounter.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Potsherd-scattered-at-archaeological-sites-Utah-November-2021.jpg?w=730&ssl=1\")
<\/div>\n